Thesaurus for Animal Physiology and Livestock Systems | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

TriPhase is a large thesaurus in the domain of animal physiology and livestock designed by INRA.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://maiage.jouy.inra.fr/?q=fr/ontologies-corpus

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)

Domain(s):

Animal Science and Animal Products

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Livestock research data

Additional information

Acronym:

TRIPHASE

Other contributor(s):

Wiktoria Golik

Robert Bossy

Pascale Avril

Emilie Bernard

Maryse Corvaisier

Marie-Laure Touzé

Nathaële Wacrenier

Agnès Girard

Claire Nédellec

Contact email:

claire.nedellec@inrae.fr

License(s):

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

CSV, OBO Flat File, RDF/XML

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRIPHASE/submissions/1/download?apike...

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

EDAM bioinformatics operations, data types, formats, identifiers and topics, Environment Ontology, Experimental Factor Ontology, Gene Ontology, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Organismal Classification, Phenotypic Quality Ontology, Plant Trait Ontology, Protein Ontology, Semantic Types Ontology, Semanticscience Integrated Ontology, Sequence Types and Features Ontology, Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Ontology, Cell Ontology, OntoBiotope, Wheat Trait Ontology, XEML Environment Ontology

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OBO

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRIPHASE

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRIPHASE

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.36

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

1.67

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Yes

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Yes

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Yes

Scores

Avg usability:

2.43

Avg openness:

3.00

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: Agroknow.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17623

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.