Plant Trait Ontology

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

A controlled vocabulary to describe phenotypic traits in plants. Each trait is a distinguishable feature, characteristic, quality or phenotypic feature of a developing or mature plant, or a plant part.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://planteome.org

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Planteome

Domain(s):

Plant Science and Plant Products

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Phenotype and Trait, Biodiversity and ecological data, Plants / germplasm, Research and agronomic data, Natural Resources, Earth and Environment data

Additional information

Acronym:

Contact email:

cooperl@science.oregonstate.edu

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

CSV, OWL/XML, RDF/XML

Namespace:

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/to.owl

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TO/submissions/3/download?apikey=1de0...

Link to machine-readable description:

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/to.owl

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OWL

Number of classes:

4456

Number of properties:

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TO

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TO

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.18

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

1.67

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Yes

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Yes

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Openly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg usability:

2.43

Avg openness:

2.29

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: Agroknow.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17607

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.

Form

Relations

assessment tabs