OWL for Observations | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

An OWL representation of the Observation Schema described in clause 6 of ISO 19156:2011 Geographic Information - Observations and Measurements.A core ontology for modeling transformation processes and their observations.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/static/ontology/isotc211/201203/om/

http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/ontology/om/om...

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

CSIRO Australia

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

[General / cross-cutting], Observations and measurement (all domains)

Segment of the value chain:

Research

Conditions (weather, soli...)

Additional information

Other contributor(s):

Simon Jonathan David Cox

Publication year:

2011

License(s):

Creative Commons Attribution

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

RDF/XML

Namespace:

http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/ontology/om/om-lite#

Download / dump:

http://eelst.cs.unibo.it/apps/LODE/source?url=http%3A//def.seegrid.csiro.au/onto...

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

DCMI Metadata Terms, ISO 19156:2011 Geographic information - Observations and measurements

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OWL

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

VEST Registry

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.04

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Yes, complete, consistent and granular

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Not clear - N/A

Used in software:

Not clear - N/A

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Not clear - N/A

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.67

Avg adoption:

1.22

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Manageable:

Not clear - N/A

Documented:

Not clear - N/A

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Not clear - N/A

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Yes

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Yes

Scores

Avg usability:

1.29

Avg openness:

3.00

Notes on assessment:

First assessment by FAO

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/20139

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.