OntoBiotope | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

The OntoBiotope Ontology describes all types of microorganism biotopes.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://lovinra.inra.fr/

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)

Domain(s):

Natural Resources, Earth and Environment

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Natural Resources, Earth and Environment data, Biodiversity and ecological data

Additional information

Acronym:

ONTOBIOTOPE

Other contributor(s):

Claire Nédellec

Contact email:

claire.nedellec@inra.fr

License(s):

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

CSV, OBO Flat File, RDF/XML

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/ONTOBIOTOPE/submissions/2/download?ap...

Link to machine-readable description:

https://data.inra.fr/api/access/datafile/8442

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

Cell Ontology, BioTop Ontology, Environment Ontology, Experimental Factor Ontology, Matter transfer ontology, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Organismal Classification, Banana Anatomy, Plant Trait Ontology, Plant Ontology, Semanticscience Integrated Ontology, Thesaurus for Animal Physiology and Livestock Systems

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OBO

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/ONTOBIOTOPE

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/ONTOBIOTOPE

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

1.97

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Not clear - N/A

Authoritative:

Largely compatible:

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Yes, in a few

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Yes, highly

Participatory, collaborative:

Maintained:

Yes

Scores

Avg fitness:

0.33

Avg adoption:

2.11

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Yes

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Yes

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Yes

Scores

Avg usability:

2.43

Avg openness:

3.00

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: Agroknow.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17586

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.