Multilingual Soilspecific Thesaurus (SoilThes): Soil Vocabulary (ISO 11074)

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

Thematic terms for categorizing soil information: "Soil Vocabulary" collection. GEMET was choosen as backbone, which means that the structure of GEMET as well as the concepts of GEMET with translations into 11 languages, are the basis of SoilThes. Any other concepts are integrated into this structure, thus creating an extension to the official vocabulary of INSPIRE.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

https://secure.umweltbundesamt.at/soil/en/collections.html

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

GS Soil project, Coordination Center PortalU at the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Protection

Domain(s):

Natural Resources, Earth and Environment

Type of standard:

Thesaurus

Describes / models / annotates:

Soil profiles, Soil research data, Research and agronomic data

Additional information

Alternative name:

GS Soil Thesaurus

Publication year:

2017

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

RDF/XML, Turtle

Relations

Uses (link to vocabulary in the map):

General Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus, INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Soil

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

SKOS

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

VEST Registry

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

1.98

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Yes, complete, consistent and granular

Authoritative:

Yes

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, very well

Used in software:

Not clear - N/A

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Not clear - N/A

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Yes, reasonably

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

3.33

Avg adoption:

1.44

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Manageable:

Not clear - N/A

Documented:

Not clear - N/A

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Not clear - N/A

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Not clear - N/A

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Not clear - N/A

Clearly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Openly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg usability:

1.29

Avg openness:

1.86

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/19999

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.