Matter transfer ontology | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

The Matter Transfer ontology is dedicated to matter transfer (eg O2, CO2, H2O) and mechanical properties of materials (eg food, packaging).

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://lovinra.inra.fr/

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)

Domain(s):

Food and Human Nutrition, Agricultural Research, Technology and Engineering

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Food nutrients, Agronomic data, agricultural technologies, Food research data, Research and agronomic data

Additional information

Acronym:

TRANSMAT

Other contributor(s):

Valérie Guillard

Patrice Buche

Luc Menut

Stéphane Dervaux

Contact email:

patrice.buche@supagro.inra.fr

License(s):

Creative Commons Attribution

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

OWL/XML

Namespace:

http://opendata.inra.fr/resources/hSC9z#

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRANSMAT/submissions/356/download?api...

Link to machine-readable description:

http://pfl.grignon.inra.fr/atWeb/DownloadFileServlet?type=owl&name=TRANSMAT

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

Biorefinery, Durum Wheat, Environment Ontology, Experimental Factor Ontology, French Crop Usage, OntoBiotope, XEML Environment Ontology

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OWL

Number of classes:

1221

Number of properties:

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRANSMAT

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/TRANSMAT

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.43

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

1.67

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Yes, on specialized vocabulary management platform

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Yes

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Yes, with machine-readable statement in metadata

Openly licensed:

Yes

Scores

Avg usability:

2.57

Avg openness:

3.14

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: Agroknow.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17580

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.