ISO 19144-2:2012 Geographic information - Classification systems -- Part 2: Land Cover Meta Language (LCML)

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

ISO 19144-2:2012 specifies a Land Cover Meta Language (LCML) expressed as a UML metamodel that allows different land cover classification systems to be described based on the physiognomic aspects. ISO 19144-2:2012 also specifies the detailed structure of a register for the extension of LCML but does not specify the maintenance of the register. ISO 19144-2:2012 recognizes that there exist a number of land cover classification systems. It provides a common reference structure for the comparison and integration of data for any generic land cover classification system, but does not intend to replace those classification systems.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

International Standards Organisation

Domain(s):

Natural Resources, Earth and Environment

Type of standard:

Data specification, Model

Describes / models / annotates:

Land cover data, Natural Resources, Earth and Environment data

Segment of the value chain:

Research

Conditions (weather, soli...)

Additional information

Acronym:

LCML

Alternative name:

Land Cover Meta Language (LCML)

Contact email:

customerservice@iso.org

Publication year:

2012

License(s):

Copyrighted

Status:

Recommended

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

UML model

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

VEST Registry

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

1.55

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Yes, complete, consistent and granular

Authoritative:

Yes

Largely compatible:

Not clear - N/A

Known:

Yes, very well

Used in software:

Not clear - N/A

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, very strongly

Long-term, sustainable:

Yes, highly

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Yes

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.67

Avg adoption:

2.11

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Not fully (e.g. via login or payment)

Versatile:

Served by APIs:

Manageable:

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Not clear - N/A

Machine-readable:

Meaningful:

Annotated:

Referenceable:

Linked:

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Scores

Avg usability:

1.00

Avg openness:

0.43

Notes on assessment:

First assessment done by FAO

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/18348

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.