INFOODS Tagnames for Food Components | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

This list of INFOODS Food Component Tagnames has been prepared from John C. Klensin, Diane Feskanich, Victor Lin, A. Stewart Truswell, David A. T. Southgate, Identification of Food Components for INFOODS Data Interchange, Tokyo: United Nations University, 1989, with updates through April 2005. The list will be periodically updated as new tags are assigned or definitions are clarified. These are the "food component" tags, occurring as immediate subsidiaries of the element.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/standards-guidelines/food-component-identifie...

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), United Nations University

Domain(s):

Food and Human Nutrition

Type of standard:

List

Describes / models / annotates:

Research and agronomic data, Food nutrients, Socio-economic data, Value chain data, Food product data, Food consumption / dietary surveys, Food research data, Demographic and social statistics

Additional information

Contact email:

nutrition@fao.org

Publication year:

2008

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

HTML

Link to machine-readable description:

http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/void.rdf

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OWL

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

VEST Registry

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

0.86

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Not clear - N/A

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Not clear - N/A

Known:

Not clear - N/A

Used in software:

Not clear - N/A

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Not clear - N/A

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Not clear - N/A

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

1.00

Avg adoption:

1.00

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Served by APIs:

Manageable:

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Yes

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Meaningful:

Annotated:

Referenceable:

Linked:

Clearly licensed:

Openly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg usability:

1.29

Avg openness:

0.14

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: Agroknow.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/18712

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.