IBP Crop Research Ontology | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

Describes experimental design, environmental conditions and methods associated with the crop study/experiment/trail and their evaluation.

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://www.cropontology.org/

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

CGIAR, Bioversity International, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)

Domain(s):

Agricultural Research, Technology and Engineering, Plant Science and Plant Products

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Agronomic data, agricultural technologies, Plants / germplasm, Research and agronomic data

Segment of the value chain:

Research

Conditions (weather, soli...)

Additional information

Acronym:

CO_715

Other contributor(s):

Rosemary Shrestha

Contact email:

r.shrestha2@cgiar.org

License(s):

Creative Commons Attribution

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

CSV, OBO Flat File, RDF/XML

Namespace:

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CO_715.obo

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_715/submissions/2/download?apikey=...

Link to machine-readable description:

http://www.cropontology.org/serve/AMIfv97g6GnRxEQ-xg8zg6AGoofvBkp3BerLYlzrWBCF1T...

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

Environment Ontology, Experimental Factor Ontology, FAO-IPGRI Multi-Crop Passport Ontology, Semanticscience Integrated Ontology

RDF vocabulary

Number of classes:

256

Number of properties:

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_715

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_715

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.14

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

1.67

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Yes, on specialized vocabulary management platform

Documented:

Not clear - N/A

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Not clear - N/A

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Not clear - N/A

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Openly licensed:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg usability:

2.43

Avg openness:

2.14

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: FAO.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17620

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.