Banana Anatomy | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

Ontology of the Banana Anatomy

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://www.cropontology.org/

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Bioversity International

Domain(s):

Plant Science and Plant Products

Type of standard:

Ontology

Describes / models / annotates:

Plant Anatomy and Development, Plants / germplasm, Research and agronomic data

Additional information

Acronym:

CO_125

Other contributor(s):

Elizabeth Arnaud

Contact email:

helpdesk@cropontology-curationtool.org

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

CSV, OBO Flat File, RDF/XML

Namespace:

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/TEMP

Download / dump:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_125/submissions/1/download?apikey=...

Relations

Aligned / mapped to (link to vocabulary in the map):

OntoBiotope, Plant Ontology, Plant Trait Ontology

Uses (name of vocabulary not in the map):

Crop Ontology

RDF vocabulary

RDF "language":

OBO

Number of classes:

150

Number of properties:

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

AgroPortal

Agroportal URI:

http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_125

Agroportal Web page:

http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/CO_125

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

2.36

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in a few tools

Used in datasets:

Not clear - N/A

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Not clear - N/A

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Not clear - N/A

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Not clear - N/A

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

1.67

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Yes, 2-3 similar formats

Served by APIs:

Yes, to get web- or user- friendly results

Yes, to lookup terms / concepts using several parameters

Yes, to automatically annotate text or data

Yes, to perform cross-walks between vocabularies

Manageable:

Yes, on a collaborative environment (e.g. Github)

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Yes

Testable:

Machine-readable:

Yes

Meaningful:

Yes

Annotated:

Not clear - N/A

Referenceable:

Yes

Linked:

Yes

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Yes

Scores

Avg usability:

2.71

Avg openness:

2.71

Notes on assessment:

First technical assessment (usability / openness) made by: ODI.

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/17599

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.