AgMIP Json Data Object format | Agrisemantics Map of Data Standards

PLEASE HELP US BY COMPLETING A QUICK SURVEY ON THE USE OF THIS MAP: click here

Format used by AgMIP models: data are transferred into and out of the ACE and ACMO databases through the API using JSON objects, which consist of key:value pairs. Each key in a key:value pair corresponds to a variable in the ICASA Data Dictionary .
The JSON objects can be very unstructured and are ideally suited to our experimental data, which can vary considerably from one experiment to another. However, some structure in the objects is enforced as described in this section.The JSON object has the following sections:

Form

Core information

URL(s):

http://research.agmip.org/display/dev/JSON+Data+Objects

Publisher(s) / Maintainer(s):

Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP)

Domain(s):

Agricultural Research, Technology and Engineering, Plant Science and Plant Products

Type of standard:

Binary / text data format

Describes / models / annotates:

Natural Resources, Earth and Environment data, Soil data, Weather / meteorological data, Weather observations (live or historical), Weather observations, Research and agronomic data, Plants / germplasm, Plant Anatomy and Development, Socio-economic data, Value chain data, Farm management data, Observed field data from the farm

Segment of the value chain:

Research

Conditions (weather, soli...)

Production

Additional information

Contact email:

info@agmip.org

Publication year:

2013

Status:

Recommended

Technical information

Format of the data standard:

HTML

Relations

Uses (link to vocabulary in the map):

ICASA Data Standards for Agricultural Field Experiments and Production

VEST / AgroPortal integration

Original source:

VEST Registry

Assessment

An overview of criteria used for the assessment can be found here.

Total score:

1.55

assessment tabs

Fitness / adoption

Complete:

Fairly complete but needs complementary vocabularies

Authoritative:

Not clear - N/A

Largely compatible:

Yes

Known:

Yes, moderately

Used in software:

Yes, in 1-2 tools

Used in datasets:

Yes, in a few

Discoverable:

Yes

Regulatory:

Endorsed:

Yes, moderately

Long-term, sustainable:

Yes, reasonably

Participatory, collaborative:

Not clear - N/A

Maintained:

Yes

Scores

Avg fitness:

2.33

Avg adoption:

2.00

Usability / openness

Available on the web:

Yes

Versatile:

Served by APIs:

Manageable:

Not clear - N/A

Documented:

Yes

Supported:

Not clear - N/A

Testable:

Not clear - N/A

Machine-readable:

Not clear - N/A

Meaningful:

Annotated:

Referenceable:

Linked:

Clearly licensed:

Yes

Openly licensed:

Scores

Avg usability:

1.29

Avg openness:

0.57

Notes on assessment:

First assessment done by FAO

URI: https://vest.agrisemantics.org/node/20128

RDF

If you're logged in, you can EDIT this record if you registered it or claimed it or you can CLAIM it if you want permission to edit it.